+34 641 10 27 16

eCash (XEC): a complete guide to the coin and its mining

Coin encyclopedia

eCash (XEC): 58 percent of the reward, Avalanche and SHA-256

Heir to the minority chain of the 2020 Bitcoin Cash split. The full block subsidy is 3,125,000 XEC, yet only 1,812,500 reaches the miner: the rest is shared by stakers, the protocol and the ecosystem.

SHA-256Proof-of-Work and Avalanche58 percent to the minerReal time adjustment

About the coin

eCash is a proof of work network that grew out of the minority chain of the Bitcoin Cash split on 15 November 2020. The argument back then was not about block size, it was about money: the Bitcoin ABC client wanted part of the block reward to be diverted into a development fund by force, and most miners rejected that. The chain that accepted the diversion stayed in the minority and picked up the ticker BCHA.

On 1 July 2021 the project was renamed eCash with the ticker XEC. A redenomination came at the same time: 1 BCHA turned into 1,000,000 XEC, and the number of decimal places was cut from eight to two. Without that coefficient every numeric comparison on the page reads wrong: a reward of 3,125,000 XEC is exactly the same 3.125 coins of the old denomination that Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash pay out.

The main fact for a hardware owner is this, and there is no sense in hiding it: the miner receives only 58 percent of the block reward. Another 10 percent goes to Avalanche stakers, 16 percent to protocol development and 16 percent to the ecosystem. That is a direct deduction from profitability on the very same machines, and neither Bitcoin nor Bitcoin Cash has anything like it. The diversion that caused the split in the first place was not cancelled here, it was widened.

The page is built as a practitioner reference: how the reward split works, what the Avalanche layer adds on top of proof of work, why real time difficulty adjustment pulls income back to parity with Bitcoin, a ranking of current ASICs from our catalogue and a separate look at the figures that large aggregators and calculators publish in a distorted form.

Coin card

ParameterValue
NameeCash
TickerXEC
Network launch2020, split from Bitcoin Cash on 15 November
Former name and tickerBitcoin Cash ABC, ticker BCHA, until 1 July 2021
Redenomination1 BCHA equals 1,000,000 XEC, two decimal places instead of eight
AlgorithmSHA-256, double hashing
ConsensusProof-of-Work plus an Avalanche layer on top of it
Maximum emission21,000,000,000,000 XEC, the same 21 million in the old denomination
Full block reward3,125,000 XEC, in force since April 2024
Miner share1,812,500 XEC, that is 58 percent of the reward
Target block time10 minutes
Difficulty adjustmentASERT at every block plus real time adjustment since November 2024
Next halvingBlock 1,050,000, expected in 2028
Address formatCashAddr with the ecash prefix
TokenseTokens in the SLP and ALP standards
Reference clientBitcoin ABC, branch 0.33

Project history

  • 2020The Bitcoin Cash split on 15 November. The cause was financial rather than technical: the Bitcoin ABC client demanded that 8 percent of the reward be diverted into a development fund, and roughly 82 percent of miners backed the alternative client. The ABC chain stayed in the minority and was listed by exchanges under the ticker BCHA.
  • 2021The rebranding of 1 July: the project became eCash and the ticker changed to XEC. A redenomination of one to a million took place and the number of decimal places was cut from eight to two. A move to a hybrid model with Avalanche on top of proof of work was announced.
  • 2022Avalanche Post-Consensus reached the main network on 14 September inside Bitcoin ABC 0.26.0. Nodes gained the ability to vote on blocks that had already been mined, which brought protection from reorganisations and one block finality. Exchanges were able to credit deposits after a single confirmation.
  • 2023Staking rewards were switched on 15 November. From that moment 10 percent of the block reward goes to Avalanche stakers, the entry threshold is 100,000,000 XEC in a single unspent output, and the chance of winning is proportional to the size of the stake.
  • 2024The halving in April at block 840,000: the full subsidy fell from 6,250,000 to 3,125,000 XEC and the miner share from 3,625,000 to 1,812,500 XEC. Annual supply inflation dropped to roughly 0.83 percent.
  • 2024XEC was delisted by the OKX exchange on 6 June. Trading in part of the pairs stopped, the coin remained on smaller venues and liquidity narrowed noticeably.
  • 2024The Heartbeat upgrade on 15 November: real time target adjustment was enabled. The network began raising difficulty whenever blocks arrive faster than the ten minute schedule, which removes the runs of very fast blocks that follow hashrate arriving and leaving.
  • 2024In December the first results of real time adjustment were published: the spread of block times narrowed and the slumps that follow rented hashrate leaving became shorter.
  • 2025Support for the ALP token standard was added to the protocol alongside the inherited SLP. By the end of the year the network counted more than 1,200 issued eTokens and over 350 collections of non fungible units.
  • 2025Ecosystem launches: the XECX staking application, a fully reworked Cashtab wallet with the built in Agora decentralised exchange, the Local eCash marketplace with non custodial escrow and the PayButton plugin for WordPress.
  • 2025Avalanche Pre-Consensus reached the main network on 15 November. A transaction gains finality within seconds, before it even enters a block, which removes the wait for confirmations in payment scenarios.
  • 2026The network upgrade of 15 May, activated by the median time of the last eleven blocks. It brought no new protocol features but required nodes to move to branch 0.33: the first block after activation was 949,200.
  • 2026On the first of July Firma was presented, a dollar stablecoin on eCash with no separate gas fee and no way for the issuer to freeze funds.
  • 2026The project name landed in the news noise because of an unrelated event: a Bitcoin hard fork activating sidechains is scheduled for August 2026, and its authors called it eCash as well. It has nothing to do with the XEC network, yet some aggregators merged the two projects into a single card.

How the network works

The accounting model is inherited from Bitcoin unchanged: the network stores no account balances, only a list of unspent outputs. A transaction references previous outputs, spends them and creates new ones, and the right to spend is proved by a signature. The only difference is how amounts are displayed: after the 2021 redenomination XEC has two decimal places, so the smallest indivisible unit is one hundredth of a coin.

Then comes the part that neighbouring chains do not have. A transaction goes not only into the common waiting pool but also to a vote among the nodes that hold a stake. The Avalanche mechanism polls a random sample of participants, repeats the poll and converges on a shared decision within a few rounds. Since November 2025 this works before a transaction enters a block too: the recipient sees the final status within seconds, without waiting for confirmation by work.

It is important to understand how the roles are divided, because this gets confused constantly. Blocks are still created by proof of work alone: miners grind through hashes, find a block, and that is how the entire emission of the coin comes into being. Avalanche creates no blocks and issues no coins, it votes on a block that is already there and decides whether to accept it or reject it. Stakers do not replace miners, they check them.

From that follows a practical consequence for a hardware owner. A block that breaks the rules, including the real time target rule, can be rejected by a vote of the stakers even when its hash is formally valid. An attempt to rewrite recent chain history runs into the same vote: the nodes have already locked in their choice and will not accept a competing branch after the fact.

  1. The wallet signs a transactionThe key owner builds a transfer to a CashAddr address with the ecash prefix and signs it. The private key never leaves the device.
  2. Nodes vote through AvalancheStake holders poll each other with a random sample and converge on a decision within a few rounds. Since November 2025 a transaction gains final status in seconds, before it is included in a block.
  3. The pool assembles a block templateThe operator picks transactions and hands the job out to the connected machines. The template must carry the outputs to stakers and to the funds: without them the block will fail validation.
  4. The ASIC grinds through hashesThe hardware changes the service fields of the header and computes double SHA-256 until the result falls below the target. The machines are the same ones used on Bitcoin, no modification is needed.
  5. The block is publishedThe first transaction creates a reward of 3,125,000 XEC and splits it immediately: 1,812,500 to the miner, 312,500 to stakers and 500,000 each to protocol development and to the ecosystem.
  6. Nodes accept or reject the blockAvalanche votes on the block once it appears. The real time target is checked as well: a block found too quickly is rejected even if its hash formally fits.
  7. Difficulty is corrected at onceASERT compares the actual block time with the scheduled one and moves the target immediately. On top of it runs the real time adjustment, which raises the bar during the interval between blocks.

Mining algorithm

SHA-256 is used here exactly as in Bitcoin: the function is applied twice to the 80 byte block header while the miner varies the service fields until the hash falls below the target. Neither the 2020 split nor the 2021 rebranding touched the function itself, so all hardware is fully compatible and switches between networks by changing a pool address.

The function needs no memory and consists of simple logical operations, which makes it easy to freeze into silicon. ASICs pushed graphics cards out long before eCash appeared. A modern machine delivers hundreds of terahashes at an efficiency of around 10 joules per terahash, a graphics card works at the level of tens of megahashes: the gap is measured in thousands of times, and no electricity tariff wins it back.

Mining XEC on a graphics card or a processor makes no sense under any assumptions. It is the same algorithm and the same competition with industrial hardware as on Bitcoin. Any service promising otherwise is selling a cloud contract or running numbers that do not exist in the network.

AsicBoost works here too: the technique saves part of the computation by reusing an intermediate state of the function, iterating over the bits of the header version field. The open variant is described in BIP-320, and since the eCash block header structure is shared with Bitcoin, a machine with such firmware keeps the gain on this network as well.

The strong side of the algorithm is the same: simple verification, a mature component base and an enormous installed fleet. The weak side of eCash is its own and it is more serious than for its neighbours on the algorithm. The network accounts for hundredths of a percent of total SHA-256 power, so its own defence by work is minimal. That is precisely the gap the Avalanche layer closes: without it a network of this size would be vulnerable, with it rewriting history runs into a vote of the stakers rather than into hashrate.

Full description of the SHA-256 algorithm →

Economics and issuance

The emission cap is 21,000,000,000,000 XEC, that is exactly 21 million coins in the denomination used before the 2021 redenomination. The halving schedule is inherited from Bitcoin: a cut in half every 210,000 blocks. On 1 August 2026 around 20.06 trillion XEC were in circulation, roughly 95.4 percent of the cap.

The April 2024 halving happened at block 840,000 and lowered the full subsidy from 6,250,000 to 3,125,000 XEC. Annual supply inflation has held at around 0.83 percent since then. The next halving is tied to block 1,050,000, expected in 2028, and the subsidy will fall to 1,562,500 XEC. The protocol has no coin burning and no plans to shrink the supply already issued: only the rate of issuance goes down.

Now the main reason to read this page before buying a machine. The block reward is split by force, at the level of network rules: 58 percent to the miner, 10 percent to Avalanche stakers, 16 percent to protocol development and 16 percent to growing the ecosystem. In coins at the current subsidy that is 1,812,500 XEC to the miner, 312,500 to stakers and 500,000 into each of the two funds. A pool cannot opt out of those outputs: nodes will not accept a block without them.

This is where the most common calculator reading error comes from. Specialist services show a reward of 1,812,500 XEC, and that is correct, because that is exactly what reaches the miner. But the figure cannot be plugged in as the full block subsidy and cannot be compared with the 3.125 coins of Bitcoin: the comparable value is 3,125,000 XEC, and the difference between the two numbers is the very 42 percent that passes the hardware owner by.

Fees as a source of miner income are absent here entirely. Block space is effectively unlimited, the network runs at a fraction of a percent of its capacity and a transfer fee sits at the level of fractions of a cent. Income has to be planned from the subsidy alone, and specifically from the part of it that reaches the miner.

Network parameters

ParameterValue
AlgorithmSHA-256, applied twice
ConsensusProof-of-Work to create blocks, Avalanche to accept them
Target block time10 minutes
Difficulty adjustmentASERT at every block plus real time target adjustment since 15 November 2024
How real time adjustment worksThe target tightens as time since the previous block grows, and a block found too early is rejected by the vote
FinalityOne block since September 2022, seconds before the block since November 2025
Staking threshold100,000,000 XEC in a single unspent output
Staker share of the reward10 percent, distributed in proportion to stake size
Block size limit32 MB, inherited from Bitcoin Cash
ThroughputAround 52 transactions per second by the limit, a recorded peak near 31, actual load around 0.14
Decimal placesTwo, the smallest unit is one hundredth of an XEC
Address formatsCashAddr with the ecash prefix
TokenseTokens in the SLP and ALP standards, with support for non fungible units and stablecoins
ConfirmationsFormally one is enough thanks to the Avalanche vote, exchanges usually ask for more

Which ASICs work

The full table of SHA-256 models from our catalogue sorted by efficiency: eCash runs on exactly the same fleet of machines as Bitcoin, and no dedicated XEC hardware exists or ever will.

ModelHashratePower drawEfficiency
SealMiner A4 Ultra Hydro 886 TH/s8372 W9.449 J/TH
SealMiner A4 Pro Air 336 TH/s3662 W10.899 J/TH
SealMiner A4 Pro Hydro 680 TH/s7412 W10.9 J/TH
Antminer S21 XP Hydro AsicBoost473 TH/s5676 W12 J/TH
SealMiner A3 Pro Hydro 660 TH/s8250 W12.5 J/TH
SealMiner A3 Pro Air 290 TH/s3625 W12.5 J/TH
Avalon A16XP 300 TH/s3850 W12.833 J/TH
Whatsminer M70S+ 244 TH/s3140 W12.869 J/TH
Whatsminer M73S+ 540 TH/s7200 W13.333 J/TH
Whatsminer M76S+ 390 TH/s5200 W13.333 J/TH
Antminer S21 XP Immersion AsicBoost300 TH/s4050 W13.5 J/TH
Antminer S21 XP AsicBoost270 TH/s3645 W13.5 J/TH
All SHA-256 models, 136 in total
ModelHashratePower drawEfficiency
SealMiner A4 Ultra Hydro 886 TH/s8372 W9.449 J/TH
SealMiner A4 Pro Air 336 TH/s3662 W10.899 J/TH
SealMiner A4 Pro Hydro 680 TH/s7412 W10.9 J/TH
Antminer S21 XP Hydro AsicBoost473 TH/s5676 W12 J/TH
SealMiner A3 Pro Hydro 660 TH/s8250 W12.5 J/TH
SealMiner A3 Pro Air 290 TH/s3625 W12.5 J/TH
Avalon A16XP 300 TH/s3850 W12.833 J/TH
Whatsminer M70S+ 244 TH/s3140 W12.869 J/TH
Whatsminer M73S+ 540 TH/s7200 W13.333 J/TH
Whatsminer M76S+ 390 TH/s5200 W13.333 J/TH
Antminer S21 XP Immersion AsicBoost300 TH/s4050 W13.5 J/TH
Antminer S21 XP AsicBoost270 TH/s3645 W13.5 J/TH
SealMiner A3 Hydro 500 TH/s6750 W13.5 J/TH
Whatsminer M70S 250 TH/s3375 W13.5 J/TH
Whatsminer M7DS 680 TH/s9200 W13.529 J/TH
Avalon A16 282 TH/s3900 W13.83 J/TH
Whatsminer M78S 472 TH/s6550 W13.877 J/TH
SealMiner A3 Air 260 TH/s3640 W14 J/TH
Whatsminer M76S 362 TH/s5200 W14.365 J/TH
Whatsminer M73S 500 TH/s7200 W14.4 J/TH
Whatsminer M73 512 TH/s7424 W14.5 J/TH
Whatsminer M78 464 TH/s6728 W14.5 J/TH
Whatsminer M70 236 TH/s3422 W14.5 J/TH
Whatsminer M7D 634 TH/s9200 W14.511 J/TH
Whatsminer M79S 1350 TH/s20000 W14.815 J/TH
SealMiner A2 Pro Air 255 TH/s3790 W14.863 J/TH
SealMiner A2 Pro Hyd 500 TH/s7450 W14.9 J/TH
Antminer S21 Pro AsicBoost234 TH/s3510 W15 J/TH
Antminer S21+ Hydro AsicBoost319 TH/s4785 W15 J/TH
Teraflux AI3680 375 TH/s5625 W15 J/TH
Whatsminer M72S 264 TH/s4000 W15.152 J/TH
Whatsminer M76 336 TH/s5200 W15.476 J/TH
Whatsminer M66S++ 356 TH/s5518 W15.5 J/TH
Whatsminer M6DS++ 592 TH/s9200 W15.541 J/TH
Whatsminer M79 920 TH/s14500 W15.761 J/TH
Whatsminer M60S++ 226 TH/s3600 W15.929 J/TH
Antminer S21 Hydro AsicBoost335 TH/s5360 W16 J/TH
Teraflux AT2880 260 TH/s4160 W16 J/TH
Whatsminer M72 246 TH/s4000 W16.26 J/TH
Antminer S21+ AsicBoost216 TH/s3564 W16.5 J/TH
Antminer S21 Immersion AsicBoost301 TH/s4967 W16.502 J/TH
SealMiner A2 Hyd 446 TH/s7360 W16.502 J/TH
SealMiner A2 226 TH/s3730 W16.504 J/TH
Whatsminer M60S+ 212 TH/s3600 W16.981 J/TH
Whatsminer M63S+ 424 TH/s7208 W17 J/TH
Whatsminer M66S+ 318 TH/s5406 W17 J/TH
Whatsminer M6DS+ 540 TH/s9200 W17.037 J/TH
Antminer S21 AsicBoost200 TH/s3500 W17.5 J/TH
Avalon A15XP-206T 206 TH/s3667 W17.801 J/TH
Teraflux AH3880 600 TH/s10740 W17.9 J/TH
Avalon A1566I 249 TH/s4500 W18.072 J/TH
Avalon A1566 185 TH/s3420 W18.486 J/TH
Whatsminer M63S 390 TH/s7215 W18.5 J/TH
Whatsminer M66S 298 TH/s5513 W18.5 J/TH
Whatsminer M60S 186 TH/s3441 W18.5 J/TH
Avalon Q 90 TH/s1674 W18.6 J/TH
Avalon A15-194T 194 TH/s3647 W18.799 J/TH
Antminer T21 AsicBoost190 TH/s3610 W19 J/TH
Antminer S19 XP+ Hydro AsicBoost279 TH/s5301 W19 J/TH
Whatsminer M60 172 TH/s3422 W19.895 J/TH
Whatsminer M63 366 TH/s7283 W19.899 J/TH
Whatsminer M66 280 TH/s5572 W19.9 J/TH
DesiweMiner K10Ultra 170 TH/s3485 W20.5 J/TH
Antminer S19 XP Hydro AsicBoost255 TH/s5304 W20.8 J/TH
Whatsminer M63S++ 478 TH/s10000 W20.921 J/TH
Teraflux AI2500 250 TH/s5250 W21 J/TH
Avalon Mini 3 37.5 TH/s800 W21.333 J/TH
Antminer S19j XP AsicBoost151 TH/s3247 W21.503 J/TH
Antminer S19 XP AsicBoost141 TH/s3032 W21.504 J/TH
Avalon Made A1466 150 TH/s3230 W21.533 J/TH
Teraflux AT1500 185 TH/s4070 W22 J/TH
Whatsminer M53S++ 320 TH/s7040 W22 J/TH
Whatsminer M56S++ 240 TH/s5280 W22 J/TH
Whatsminer M50S++ 160 TH/s3520 W22 J/TH
DesiweMiner K10Pro 170 TH/s3825 W22.5 J/TH
Antminer S19k Pro AsicBoost120 TH/s2760 W23 J/TH
Avalon Nano 3S 6 TH/s140 W23.333 J/TH
Whatsminer M53S+ Hydro 290 TH/s6960 W24 J/TH
Whatsminer M50S+ 130 TH/s3120 W24 J/TH
Avalon Made A1446 135 TH/s3310 W24.519 J/TH
Avalon Made A1366 130 TH/s3250 W25 J/TH
Whatsminer M53S Hydro 260 TH/s6760 W26 J/TH
Whatsminer M50S 126 TH/s3276 W26 J/TH
Antminer S19 Pro+ Hydro AsicBoost198 TH/s5445 W27.5 J/TH
Antminer S19j Pro+ AsicBoost122 TH/s3355 W27.5 J/TH
Whatsminer M56S 200 TH/s5550 W27.75 J/TH
Whatsminer M53 228 TH/s6612 W29 J/TH
Whatsminer M50 114 TH/s3306 W29 J/TH
Antminer S19 Pro Hydro AsicBoost184 TH/s5428 W29.5 J/TH
Antminer S19a Pro AsicBoost110 TH/s3245 W29.5 J/TH
Antminer S19j Pro AsicBoost104 TH/s3068 W29.5 J/TH
Antminer S19 Pro AsicBoost110 TH/s3250 W29.545 J/TH
Avalon Made A1346 110 TH/s3300 W30 J/TH
Whatsminer M30S++ 112 TH/s3472 W31 J/TH
Whatsminer M56 178 TH/s5550 W31.18 J/TH
BlockMiner Model 740a 150 TH/s4900 W32.667 J/TH
BlockMiner Model 520i 112 TH/s3700 W33.036 J/TH
Whatsminer M30+ 100 TH/s3400 W34 J/TH
Whatsminer M30S+ 100 TH/s3400 W34 J/TH
Antminer S19 AsicBoost95 TH/s3250 W34.211 J/TH
Antminer S19a AsicBoost96 TH/s3312 W34.5 J/TH
Avalon Nano 3 4 TH/s140 W35 J/TH
Antminer T19 AsicBoost84 TH/s3150 W37.5 J/TH
Antminer T19 Hydro AsicBoost145 TH/s5438 W37.503 J/TH
Avalon 1246 90 TH/s3420 W38 J/TH
Whatsminer M30S 86 TH/s3268 W38 J/TH
DesiweMiner K9S 130 TH/s4950 W38.077 J/TH
Antminer S17 Pro 53 TH/s2094 W39.509 J/TH
Antminer S17+ 73 TH/s2920 W40 J/TH
Avalon 1166 Pro 81 TH/s3400 W41.975 J/TH
Whatsminer M31S+ 80 TH/s3360 W42 J/TH
Antminer S17e 64 TH/s2880 W45 J/TH
Antminer S17 56 TH/s2520 W45 J/TH
Whatsminer M31S 70 TH/s3220 W46 J/TH
Innosilicon T3-43T 43 TH/s2100 W48.837 J/TH
Antminer T17+ 58 TH/s2900 W50 J/TH
Ebit E12+ 50 TH/s2500 W50 J/TH
Avalon 1126 Pro 68 TH/s3420 W50.294 J/TH
Avalon 1146 Pro 63 TH/s3276 W52 J/TH
Innosilicon T3+ 52T 52 TH/s2800 W53.846 J/TH
Antminer T17e 53 TH/s2915 W55 J/TH
Antminer T17 40 TH/s2200 W55 J/TH
Innosilicon T3-39T 39 TH/s2150 W55.128 J/TH
Ebit E12 44 TH/s2500 W56.818 J/TH
Antminer S15 28 TH/s1596 W57 J/TH
Innosilicon T3+ 57T 57 TH/s3300 W57.895 J/TH
Innosilicon T3 50T 50 TH/s3100 W62 J/TH
Avalon 1047 37 TH/s2380 W64.324 J/TH
Avalon 1066 50 TH/s3250 W65 J/TH
Antminer T15 23 TH/s1541 W67 J/TH
Avalon 921 20 TH/s1700 W85 J/TH
Antminer S9j 14.5 TH/s1350 W93.103 J/TH
Antminer S9i 14 TH/s1320 W94.286 J/TH
Antminer S9 13.5 TH/s1323 W98 J/TH
Antminer T9+ AsicBoost10.5 TH/s1432 W136.381 J/TH
Avalon 7 7.3 TH/s1150 W157.534 J/TH

Browse miners in the catalogue →

Best machines for this coin

The ranking follows real efficiency from the catalogue, and the break even thresholds are computed from revenue of around 32 dollars per petahash per day, which follows from the miner share of 1,812,500 XEC, a price near 0.0000069 dollars and a network hashrate around 55 PH/s on 1 August 2026.

Pros. The best efficiency in the catalogue: 886 TH/s at 8,372 W, that is 9.45 J/TH. The only class of machine that keeps a margin after the 42 percent of the reward is deducted.

Cons. Needs a ready water loop, a heat exchanger and three phase power. Deploying such a machine outside an industrial site is pointless.

Best suited for. Industrial sites with their own heat rejection and automatic pool switching.

Payback. The electricity break even point sits near 0.14 dollars per kilowatt hour: the machine brings in around 28 dollars of revenue a day while consuming about 201 kilowatt hours. On a Spanish household tariff that is a loss.

Cooling. Water cooling, an external loop is mandatory

Pros. 336 TH/s at 3,662 W, 10.9 J/TH. The best efficiency among air cooled models in the catalogue, with no water loop needed.

Cons. Industrial grade noise and heat flow. Third party firmware builds for this line are not marked in our catalogue.

Best suited for. Small sites and containers without water infrastructure.

Payback. The electricity threshold is around 0.12 dollars per kilowatt hour: roughly 10.8 dollars of revenue against 88 kilowatt hours a day. Above that mark XEC does not even cover the energy bill.

Cooling. Air cooling, organised intake and extraction required

Pros. 680 TH/s at 7,412 W, 10.9 J/TH. High hashrate density per rack at the same efficiency as the air cooled version.

Cons. Complete dependence on the loop: water stopping means the machine stopping and losing its share in the pool.

Best suited for. Data centres where the water loop is already built and loaded.

Payback. The electricity threshold is around 0.12 dollars per kilowatt hour, the same as the air version of that generation.

Cooling. Water cooling

Pros. 473 TH/s at 5,676 W, 12.0 J/TH. The model officially accepts third party firmware builds with fine frequency tuning and an AsicBoost mode.

Cons. Requires a water loop and already trails the 2026 generation on efficiency by about a quarter.

Best suited for. Sites running Bitmain hardware where reflashing and undervolting matter.

Payback. The electricity threshold is around 0.11 dollars per kilowatt hour: some 15 dollars of revenue at 136 kilowatt hours a day. At home on Spanish tariffs it does not pay back.

Cooling. Water cooling

Pros. 290 TH/s at 3,625 W, 12.5 J/TH. Moderate consumption per machine with air cooling.

Cons. A previous generation, so the headroom against difficulty is noticeably smaller, and on eCash the reward deduction eats into it further.

Best suited for. Those building hashrate from machines drawing up to 4 kW.

Payback. The electricity threshold is around 0.11 dollars per kilowatt hour, and real payback exists only on an industrial tariff.

Cooling. Air cooling

Pros. 300 TH/s at 3,850 W, 12.83 J/TH. An alternative to the two main vendors, useful for spreading a fleet across brands.

Cons. The third party firmware ecosystem is thinner than for Antminer, so fine tuning is limited.

Best suited for. Sites that deliberately keep hardware from different manufacturers.

Payback. The electricity threshold is around 0.10 dollars per kilowatt hour: roughly 9.6 dollars of revenue at 92 kilowatt hours. The home scenario runs at a loss.

Cooling. Air cooling

Pros. 244 TH/s at 3,140 W, 12.87 J/TH. The lowest consumption among the leaders of the ranking.

Cons. Less hashrate per unit, so the cost of housing and servicing per terahash is higher.

Best suited for. Sites limited by the electrical capacity they have available.

Payback. The electricity threshold is around 0.10 dollars per kilowatt hour. At a tariff of 0.15 euro the machine runs at a loss on any SHA-256 network.

Cooling. Air cooling

Pros. 270 TH/s at 3,645 W, 13.5 J/TH. The most widespread air cooled machine with support for third party builds and the AsicBoost mode.

Cons. It loses about a third to the 2026 generation on efficiency, and the eCash reward deduction makes that gap more painful.

Best suited for. The default choice for a mid sized fleet on Bitmain hardware.

Payback. The electricity threshold is around 0.10 dollars per kilowatt hour: about 8.6 dollars of revenue at 87.5 kilowatt hours a day. Anything dearer takes the whole income.

Cooling. Air cooling

Pros. 300 TH/s at 4,050 W, 13.5 J/TH. The immersion build removes the noise and dust question and supports third party builds and AsicBoost.

Cons. Needs a tank, dielectric fluid and a heat rejection loop. The cost of that plumbing is comparable to the cost of the machine itself.

Best suited for. Sites where heat is put to use and noise is critical for the location.

Payback. The electricity threshold is around 0.10 dollars per kilowatt hour before the cost of the plumbing. With it included, the payback period on eCash does not come out positive.

Cooling. Immersion, a tank and a heat exchanger are required

Hardware manufacturers

BitmainAntminer S19, S21 and T21 series, up to 473 TH/s

The largest manufacturer by number of models in the catalogue. Only this vendor has machines in our database marked as supporting third party firmware builds with an AsicBoost mode, which matters more on eCash than usual: undervolting is the single lever that offsets the reward deduction.

MicroBTWhatsminer M50, M60, M70 and M79 series, up to 1,350 TH/s

The second largest fleet in the catalogue. The M79S line gives the highest hashrate per chassis of any model in the database. Third party firmware for these machines is not marked in our catalogue, so fine tuning is limited to factory modes.

SealMinerA2, A3 and A4 series, best figure 9.45 J/TH

Holds the top places on efficiency: the A4 Ultra Hydro delivers 886 TH/s at 8,372 W. There are air cooled versions too, which is rare for machines of that class. On networks with a trimmed reward, an advantage in joules per terahash decides more than anything else.

CanaanAvalon series, from the Nano 3 at 4 TH/s to the A16XP at 300 TH/s

The only vendor in the catalogue with a proper home line: the Avalon Nano 3 draws 140 W. Devices like that are fine for learning and for the solo lottery, but they cannot be counted as income on XEC or on BTC.

TerafluxAT, AI and AH series, up to 600 TH/s at 17.9 J/TH

Niche models, represented in the catalogue by five positions. The efficiency of the best examples sits around 15 J/TH, that is between the S21 and S21 XP generations. On eCash such machines are firmly loss making at European tariffs.

Firmware and overclocking

Firmware does not distinguish between networks: the machine computes the same SHA-256, and where the result goes is decided by the pool line in the settings. Everything that applies to a Bitcoin fleet applies to eCash without reservations, and no reflashing is needed when switching coins.

The stock Bitmain build lets you start the machine and pick one of the preset modes, but it does not let you set voltage and frequency per board. There is no way to bring a specific unit to its own optimum that way, and chips even from one batch differ noticeably.

Third party builds solve that problem. Through HashCore Toolkit the supported Antminer S19 and S21 models take firmware with manual per chain frequency and voltage control, automatic mode selection and telemetry from every hash board. The developer fee is 2.8 percent.

The key feature of such builds is AsicBoost. It saves part of the SHA-256 work by reusing an intermediate state of the function: the bits of the header version field are iterated over, not just the service counter. The open variant is described in BIP-320 and works on eCash exactly as it does on Bitcoin, because the two networks share the block header structure.

On eCash the economic case for tuning is stronger than on neighbouring chains, and that should be taken literally. Fees add nothing to income here, and only 58 percent of the subsidy reaches the hardware owner. The only levers left are the price of a kilowatt hour and joules per terahash, so every percent shaved off by undervolting weighs more. The usual limits still apply: reflashing voids the warranty and wrong voltages degrade the boards, so work with a backup of the factory build and raise the changes gradually.

How to start mining

The technical entry barrier is low: any SHA-256 ASIC already running on Bitcoin will do. You need a wallet with a CashAddr address, an account on a pool that supports XEC and one line edited in the web interface of the machine. No special firmware, drivers or separate hardware are required.

In practice the list of pools here is shorter than on Bitcoin and changes more often. Before connecting it is worth checking that the chosen venue really submits blocks to the network rather than simply keeping XEC on a list for show. It also helps that some operators can move hashrate between SHA-256 networks automatically by current profitability: on eCash that is worth more than usual, because the profitable moment to enter is exactly a moment of desynchronisation.

The home scenario is closed off for the same reasons as on Bitcoin, only harder. An industrial air cooled machine runs at 75 decibels and above, works around the clock and needs its own line with a 16 to 32 ampere breaker. A heat flow of 3 to 4 kilowatts has to go somewhere. At a Spanish household tariff of around 0.15 euro per kilowatt hour, eCash revenue does not cover electricity on a single model in the catalogue.

The industrial scenario differs in tariff and in packing density. Water cooled and immersion models give the best joules per terahash but need a ready loop and a heat exchanger: the plumbing costs money and does not pay for itself on one machine. The real boundary runs at roughly 0.10 to 0.14 dollars per kilowatt hour depending on the model, and that already accounts for the 42 percent of the reward that never reaches you.

One scenario that neighbouring chains do not offer is combining mining with staking. The entry threshold is 100,000,000 XEC in a single unspent output, which at the price on 1 August 2026 is a modest sum of a few hundred dollars. Formally nothing stops you from accumulating what you mine up to the threshold and clawing back part of the 10 percent the network takes from the miner for the stakers, but that is a separate role with a separate requirement to keep a node online.

Profitability and what drives it

Income is calculated from four quantities: machine hashrate, network difficulty, coin price and fees. For eCash the last term can safely be treated as zero, and the first three have to be multiplied by 0.58. No settings, pool or firmware cancel that multiplier: the outputs to stakers and funds are written into the rules and checked by nodes.

A useful shorthand is revenue per petahash per day. From the miner share of 1,812,500 XEC, a price near 0.0000069 dollars and the network hashrate you get roughly 26 to 43 dollars per PH/s per day, with a central estimate around 32. The spread is wide precisely because the eCash hashrate swings by multiples: capacity arrives and leaves following profitability. For comparison, Bitcoin was paying around 32 dollars per petahash on the same days.

Hence the main and deliberately dull conclusion: eCash carries no lasting premium over Bitcoin. Average profitability on one and the same ASIC hovers around parity, and that is not a coincidence but a consequence of how the network is built. The moment XEC becomes more profitable, rented capacity shows up, real time target adjustment tightens the bar immediately and the premium closes within hours rather than in the two weeks it would take with periodic recalculation. Entering the network only makes sense during moments of desynchronisation, and catching those by hand is close to impossible.

The second factor, which on a coin this thin weighs more than the calculated income, is liquidity. Daily turnover is measured in a couple of tens of millions of dollars against a capitalisation of a hundred million and change, and some large venues have already pulled the coin from trading. Selling a noticeable amount of what you mine moves the price, and a badly chosen exchange adds a risk that is absent when working with Bitcoin.

Open the profitability calculator →

Mining pools

PoolPayout schemeFeeNote
ViaBTCPPS+, PPLNS or soloCheck with the poolOne of the few large operators that keep XEC as a separate line. Daily automatic payouts with no fee and free transfers to the linked exchange. The XEC rates differ from the rates of the same pool on Bitcoin, so check them in your account.
Kryptex PoolPPS+ or solo1 to 2 percentLets you mine straight to a wallet without registration and publishes its own XEC difficulty and hashrate charts. Handy for single machines and for confirming that the coin is being mined at all.
SolopoolSoloAround 1.5 percentA pure solo lottery: a whole block or nothing. Tracker summaries credit it with a noticeable share of found XEC blocks, which says more about the small size of the network than about the merits of the mode.
Mining DutchPPLNS, multi algorithmCheck with the poolA multi algorithm venue with XEC support in both shared and solo modes. Volumes are small and payout variance is above average.
ZulupoolPPLNSCheck with the poolA small operator from the list published by the project itself. Suitable as a fallback if your main pool stops submitting blocks to the network.
zpoolRental and multi coin modeVenue feeNot a pool in the usual sense but a multi coin venue that pays out in a coin of your choice. Part of the eCash hashrate comes from exactly here, which is worth remembering when judging how stable the network is.
letsmineitShared and solo modeCheck with the poolA small venue from the official project list, offering both solo and shared modes. It is sensible to check its found block statistics before connecting a fleet.
JackpoolPPLNSCheck with the poolAnother niche operator from the project list. Useful for spreading risk when you would rather not keep the whole fleet on one pool.
The set of operators on eCash is less stable than on Bitcoin, and tracker coverage is incomplete: on the same days one public aggregator showed about 3 PH/s across all pools it saw, while network summaries gave 42 to 70 PH/s. The gap is explained by the tracker seeing only the venues connected to it, so pool shares cannot be computed from such a sample. Always check fees and minimum payouts on the pool site before connecting: public XEC lists go stale often, and we do not publish unverified thresholds. A useful property of most venues is automatic switching of hashrate between SHA-256 networks by current profitability.

Wallets

CategoryWallets
Main walletCashtab: a web version, a browser extension and an Android app, with eToken support, token issuance and a built in exchange venue
DesktopElectrum ABC for Windows, macOS and Linux, with multisig and pairing with hardware devices
HardwareTrezor through Electrum ABC, plus Satochip, D CENT and Ballet with native XEC support
MobileMarlin, RaiPay, Edge, Stack, Unstoppable, Guarda, Arctic and the CoinEx wallet
For a minerKeep the pool payout address on a hardware wallet or in Electrum ABC rather than on an exchange
Not recommendedWallets without support for the CashAddr format with the ecash prefix, and any service where the private key is not yours

One eCash specific point concerns staking: to take part in the Avalanche vote and claim that 10 percent of the reward you need a proof of stake ownership, signed by the key of an unspent output of 100,000,000 XEC or more. Electrum ABC can sign such proofs together with a Trezor, so the staker role does not require keeping keys on a hot machine.

When moving funds, remember the 2021 redenomination. Old addresses and old amounts in BCHA denomination do not convert to current ones automatically in your head: one coin of the old denomination is 1,000,000 XEC, and the present format has only two decimal places. The wallet recalculates everything itself, but a six order of magnitude error creeps in very easily when reconciling balances by hand against old records.

Where to buy and how to store

Nobody buys hardware specifically for eCash: any SHA-256 ASIC from our catalogue works here as well, so the choice of machine comes down to the same criteria as for Bitcoin. This is a rare case where the decision about the coin is completely detached from the decision about the iron and changes with one line in the pool settings.

The coin itself trades on Binance, including pairs against national currencies, and also on MEXC, CoinEx, Gate and Bitget. Liquidity is noticeably thinner than for its neighbours on the algorithm: daily turnover is measured in a couple of tens of millions of dollars. The shrinking list of venues deserves a separate note: OKX removed XEC from trading on 6 June 2024 and Bitfinex delisted it too. Kraken meanwhile still keeps an XEC price page even though the coin cannot be bought on that exchange, which misleads people regularly.

The practical rule for a miner is simple: do not leave what you mine on an exchange any longer than a specific trade requires. The network gives finality in seconds, so withdrawing to your own wallet creates no delay, while venue risk on a coin of this size is above average. Staking requires holding coins in an unspent output under your own key, so an exchange balance is unsuitable for that role in principle.

Strengths and weaknesses

Pros
  • Full hardware compatibility: any SHA-256 machine runs on eCash without modification, switching takes minutes and needs no reflashing.
  • Finality within seconds since November 2025: mined coins can be moved and sold without waiting for confirmations, which removes part of the risk on a volatile coin.
  • Real time target adjustment smooths block times: the network no longer gets stuck in a skewed state after rented capacity leaves, as it did before November 2024.
  • Difficulty is several orders of magnitude lower than on Bitcoin, so solo mode on a single machine remains a meaningful lottery here rather than pure formality.
  • A transfer fee at the level of fractions of a cent and a surplus of block space: moving mined coins costs practically nothing.
  • The staking threshold of 100,000,000 XEC is affordable at the current price even for the owner of one machine, so part of the withheld reward can technically be clawed back.
  • The same emission cap and the same halving schedule as Bitcoin: the economics are predictable decades ahead.
Cons
  • The miner gets only 58 percent of the block reward. That is a direct and irreversible deduction from profitability on the same hardware, and neither Bitcoin nor Bitcoin Cash has it.
  • There is no lasting premium over Bitcoin: income per terahash hovers around parity, and real time adjustment closes any deviation within hours.
  • Fees add almost nothing to the reward, so all income rests on a subsidy that has been cut by 42 percent.
  • The share of total SHA-256 hashrate is measured in hundredths of a percent: defence by work is minimal and the network leans on a vote of stakers rather than on the cost of an attack.
  • Liquidity is thin, some large venues have pulled the coin from trading, and price and capitalisation estimates differ between aggregators by a factor of one and a half.
  • Few pools actually submit blocks to the network, and public data on pool shares is unreliable because tracker coverage is incomplete.
  • The 2028 halving will cut the subsidy in half, and the network has no fees capable of replacing it, nor any prospect of them in the coming years.

What the coin is used for

The application layer on eCash is developed noticeably further than you would expect from a coin of this size. Two token standards run in the network: the inherited SLP and the newer ALP added in 2025. By the end of that same year more than 1,200 issued eTokens and over 350 collections of non fungible units were in circulation, and token transfers cost the same fractions of a cent as ordinary transactions.

The most visible use case is stablecoins. In July 2026 Firma was presented, a dollar stablecoin with no separate gas fee and no way for the issuer to freeze funds. Earlier still, eCash carried the launch of TUSDT, a stablecoin of the government of the Northern Mariana Islands, presented as the first issue of its kind by a public body in the United States. For a network with a capitalisation of a hundred million and change, that is an unusually high bar of institutional use.

The payments side is built around fast finality. The PayButton plugin embeds XEC acceptance into WordPress sites, the Local eCash marketplace offers non custodial person to person exchange with escrow, and the Agora exchange built into Cashtab lets you swap tokens straight from the wallet. There is also the optional CashFusion protocol for non custodial transaction mixing, inherited from the code base shared with Bitcoin Cash. Among services accepting XEC the project names gaming venues and car sales.

For a miner all of this matters in exactly one respect: activity on the application layer does not translate into income. Fees in this network are so small and block space so abundant that even a multiple increase in transaction count would not change block revenue in any noticeable way. Counting on eToken growth to lift mining profitability is not advisable.

Network statistics

ParameterValue
PriceAround 0.0000055 to 0.0000069 dollars, source estimates differ noticeably
CapitalisationAround 110 to 140 million dollars, place in the second hundred
Daily trading volumeAround 21 to 24 million dollars
In circulationAround 20.06 trillion XEC, roughly 95.4 percent of the cap
Network hashrateAround 42 to 70 PH/s, the spread between summaries and dates is very wide
Share of total SHA-256 hashrateAround 0.003 percent against 865 EH/s on Bitcoin
DifficultyAround 7.5 G according to a specialist aggregator
Full block reward3,125,000 XEC
Of which the miner share1,812,500 XEC, that is around 12.5 dollars per block
Revenue per petahashAround 26 to 43 dollars a day, central estimate near 32
Transactions per dayAround 16,900 according to one public explorer
Annual supply inflationAround 0.83 percent after the 2024 halving
The data was gathered on 1 August 2026. Estimates diverged more than usual that day: the price ranged from 0.0000055 dollars at one large aggregator to 0.0000069 in mining summaries, capitalisation from 110 to 140 million dollars, and hashrate from 42 PH/s in a snapshot for 29 July to 70 PH/s in a snapshot for 1 August. That is exactly why we give ranges rather than a single figure. Revenue per petahash was computed by us from the miner share of 1,812,500 XEC, a price near 0.0000069 dollars and a hashrate around 55 PH/s, so it is an estimate and not a quote. Every value listed here changes daily, and on eCash the hashrate itself jumps as well, because capacity arrives and leaves following profitability: check the current difficulty in the calculator before making any calculations.

Network security

The honest way to talk about the security of this network is as follows. The defence eCash gets from its own proof of work is minimal: the network accounts for hundredths of a percent of total SHA-256 power, and capacity sufficient for an attack is nothing remarkable on the scale of the Bitcoin market. We will not quote dollar estimates for the cost of an attack, because public calculators of that kind differ by multiples on coins this size, and misleading the reader with a figure that merely looks precise is worse than giving a qualitative assessment.

The caveat here is fundamental, and without it the picture is wrong. Since 14 September 2022 an Avalanche layer has run on top of the work: nodes holding a stake vote on a block that has already been found and decide whether to accept it. The classic attack that rewrites recent history runs not into accumulated work but into that vote: the nodes have locked in their choice and will not accept a competing branch after the fact. That is precisely why a network with such a small share of hashrate exists at all instead of being wiped out in its first month.

Since 15 November 2025 a pre consensus has been added that gives a transaction final status within seconds, before it enters a block. For a payment recipient that means a double spend is closed off by the vote before a competing block can appear. It is worth repeating the general rule that holds for any proof of work network: a majority attack does not allow stealing other people coins or creating extra ones, the most it can do is reverse the attacker own recent transactions.

The flip side of this design is concentration. There is one reference implementation here, Bitcoin ABC, the network has no alternative build of comparable weight, and the whole Avalanche voting code base was written by a single team. We found no reliable public data on the number of reachable nodes or on stake distribution, and we will not quote any. When planning fleet operations more than a year ahead it is sensible to account for the fact that upgrade predictability here is high, since they ship on 15 May and 15 November, but so is dependence on a single developer.

Compatibility and requirements

ParameterValue
HardwareSHA-256 ASICs only, the same models as for Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash
FirmwareFactory Bitmain or third party builds for the Antminer S19, S21 and T21 series
Switching networksOnly the pool address and payout wallet change, no reflashing needed
Power supplyThe stock PSU of the model, 220 V, from 3.1 to 20 kW depending on the machine
Electrical lineA separate line and a 16 to 32 A breaker per machine
CoolingAir, water or immersion depending on the model
NoiseIndustrial air cooled models around 75 decibels and above, around the clock
PremisesNon residential, with organised intake and extraction, water models need an external loop
PoolThe list of venues supporting XEC is much shorter than for Bitcoin and changes more often
Merged miningNot provided in the network, XEC mining is separate and does not run alongside another coin

Comparison with similar coins

ParametereCashBitcoin CashBitcoinWhat follows from it
Share of the reward to the miner58 percent100 percent100 percentOn eCash 42 percent of the subsidy goes to stakers and funds, a direct deduction from income on the same hardware
Full block reward3,125,000 XEC3.125 BCH3.125 BTCThe figures only compare after redenomination: 1,000,000 XEC is one coin of the old denomination
Difficulty adjustmentASERT plus a real time targetASERT, every blockOnce every 2,016 blockseCash closes a profitability spike within hours, so a premium over Bitcoin does not hold
Transaction finalitySeconds through AvalancheFrom one blockUsually from 3 to 6 blocksWithdrawing and selling mined coins on eCash requires no wait for confirmations
Share of SHA-256 hashrateAround 0.003 percentAround 0.2 percentAround 64 percentThe defence of eCash rests on a vote of stakers, not on the cost of an attack by work
The first row here matters more than all the others put together. It explains why, with a formally identical algorithm, an identical block time and an identical halving schedule, the income of a machine owner on eCash is structurally lower: 42 percent of the subsidy is distributed past him by the rules of the network itself. The second row is needed for the comparison to be valid at all, because without the redenomination coefficient the numbers 3,125,000 and 3.125 look incomparable. The third explains why the gap cannot be recovered by timing your entry well: real time target adjustment returns income to parity faster than a miner can react.

Outdated data and common errors

The August Bitcoin hard fork is passed off as an eCash event. A Bitcoin fork that activates sidechains and airdrops a new coin to BTC holders one for one is scheduled for August 2026. Its authors independently took the same name, eCash. It has nothing to do with the XEC network: a different chain, a different team, a different asset. Even so, one of the largest market aggregators was serving that fork in the news block of the XEC card on 1 August 2026 as an event of the coin itself. The coincidence is made worse by the fact that the eCash chain height approaches the same values in roughly the same weeks.

The block reward is written as 6.25 XEC. A scaling error of about half a million times, and it appears not on a forum but in a specialist mining reference. The correct numbers are these: the full subsidy is 3,125,000 XEC and the miner share is 1,812,500 XEC. Feeding 6.25 into a calculator gives you an income with no relation to reality.

The miner share is taken for the full reward. Calculators and pools show 1,812,500 XEC, and that is right, because that is exactly what reaches the miner. But the figure cannot be compared with the 3.125 coins of Bitcoin: the comparable value is the full subsidy of 3,125,000 XEC. The difference between the two numbers is the 42 percent that goes to stakers and funds.

The official mining page quotes pre halving figures. On the project site the minimum amounts of the mandatory block outputs are given as 200,000,327 and 62,500,102 satoshis. Those values were computed from the old subsidy of 6,250,000 XEC and are twice as large as reality after the April 2024 halving. Even a primary source does not always update its own figures, so check them against actual blocks.

BCHA and XEC are presented as separate assets. Some reference sites still keep a separate BCHA card with 2021 prices. There has been no separate BCHA asset since 1 July 2021: it is the very same chain renamed to eCash, with a one to a million conversion and two decimal places instead of eight. Old BCHA quotes cannot be lined up against current XEC quotes directly.

The coin is called Bitcoin ABC. Since July 2021 Bitcoin ABC has been only the name of the node implementation, currently branch 0.33. The coin itself is called eCash, ticker XEC. Reference sites that write about a Bitcoin ABC coin are describing the state of five years ago and almost always carry outdated network parameters along with it.

The reward split is described without stakers. A scheme without the staker share went out of date on 15 November 2023. The current split is this: 58 percent to the miner, 10 percent to Avalanche stakers, 16 percent to protocol development and 16 percent to the ecosystem. An even more ancient variant also circulates in which the miner gets all 100 percent: it never matched the network, because the fund diversion was the very cause of the 2020 split.

Pool shares are computed from a single tracker. On 1 August 2026 a public pool aggregator showed about 3 PH/s across the venues connected to it, while network summaries gave 42 to 70 PH/s. A tracker sees only the pools it polls itself, and shares cannot be computed from such a sample. Claims that half the eCash network belongs to one pool are built on exactly this substitution.

People point to an exchange where the coin does not trade. Kraken runs an XEC price page and turns up in search results even though the coin does not trade on that exchange. The situation is similar with venues that ran a delisting: OKX removed XEC on 6 June 2024 and Bitfinex delisted it as well. The existence of a quote page does not mean the existence of a market.

Avalanche is described as a replacement for mining. Phrasings along the lines of eCash moved to proof of stake are wrong. Blocks are created by proof of work alone, the entire emission of the coin arises through mining, and Avalanche votes on blocks and transactions that already exist. Stakers create no blocks and do not replace miners, they receive their 10 percent for taking part in the vote.

People promise that eCash is more profitable to mine than Bitcoin. On the same hardware profitability hovers around parity, and once the trimmed miner share is taken into account eCash has no structural advantage at all. Real time target adjustment, running since 15 November 2024, closes any deviation within hours: the moment the network becomes more profitable, rented capacity arrives and the bar goes up immediately.

An exact dollar cost of a 51 percent attack is quoted. On coins of this size open calculators differ by multiples, because there is almost no rentable hashrate for XEC and nothing to feed into the formula. A qualitative assessment is more honest: the defence the network gets from its own work is minimal, and what protects it from history being rewritten is the Avalanche vote, running since September 2022.

Questions and answers

What is eCash in simple terms

It is a separate proof of work network that grew out of the minority chain of the Bitcoin Cash split on 15 November 2020. Its algorithm and emission schedule are the same as Bitcoin, but the network forcibly distributes part of the block reward past the miner.

Who created eCash and who develops it now

The network grew out of the Bitcoin ABC client, which stayed in the minority during the Bitcoin Cash split over a dispute about funding development. Protocol development today is led by that same Bitcoin ABC team, while the ecosystem is handled by a council funded from the block reward share.

Why was the coin previously called BCHA

After the split on 15 November 2020 exchanges assigned the ticker BCHA to the minority chain. On the first of July 2021 the project was renamed eCash with the ticker XEC, and no separate BCHA asset has existed since that date.

What is the one to a million redenomination

At the rebranding on 1 July 2021 one coin of the old denomination turned into 1,000,000 XEC and the number of decimal places was cut from eight to two. That is why a reward of 3,125,000 XEC is exactly the same 3.125 coins that Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash pay.

What algorithm does eCash run on

SHA-256 applied twice to the block header, that is the very same algorithm as Bitcoin. The target block time is ten minutes and blocks are created by proof of work.

How much XEC does a block give and how much does the miner get

The full subsidy is 3,125,000 XEC, but the miner gets only 1,812,500, that is 58 percent. Another 10 percent goes to Avalanche stakers and 16 percent each to protocol development and to the ecosystem.

Why does the calculator show a reward of 1,812,500 and not 3,125,000

Because the calculator counts the money of the miner and takes only his share. That is correct for computing income but wrong for comparing with Bitcoin: the comparable value there is the full subsidy of 3,125,000 XEC.

Can the diversion be refused and the whole reward taken

No. The outputs to stakers and to the funds are written into the network rules and checked by nodes: a block without them will not be accepted. Neither pool settings nor third party firmware change that.

Is it more profitable to mine XEC or BTC on the same hardware

On average almost identical, and once the trimmed miner share is counted eCash has no structural advantage. Spikes in profitability do happen, but real time target adjustment closes them within hours.

What is Avalanche in eCash and does it replace mining

It does not. Blocks are created by proof of work alone and the entire emission arises through mining, while Avalanche votes on blocks and transactions that have already been found and decides whether to accept them.

What does real time difficulty adjustment give

Since 15 November 2024 the network tightens the target as time since the last block grows and rejects blocks found too quickly. That removes runs of turbo blocks when rented capacity arrives and returns income to parity with Bitcoin.

Can eCash be mined at home

Technically yes, economically no. An industrial machine runs at 75 decibels and up, needs a separate line and sheds several kilowatts of heat, and at a Spanish household tariff of around 0.15 euro per kilowatt hour the revenue does not cover electricity on a single model in the catalogue.

Which ASIC is best for eCash

The same one as for Bitcoin: efficiency in joules per terahash decides. In the catalogue the top places go to the SealMiner A4 Ultra Hydro at 9.45 J/TH and the A4 Pro at 10.9 J/TH, and among machines that support third party firmware the best figure belongs to the Antminer S21 XP Hydro.

Which pool should I choose

Among large operators, ViaBTC and Kryptex keep XEC as a separate line, and there are also Solopool, Mining Dutch and several niche venues from the project list. Before connecting, check that the pool really submits blocks to the network rather than simply keeping the coin on a list.

When is the next halving

The halving is tied to block 1,050,000 and is expected in 2028. The full subsidy will drop from 3,125,000 to 1,562,500 XEC and the miner share from 1,812,500 to 906,250 XEC.

Why does difficulty change

The base ASERT algorithm corrects the target at every block by comparing actual time with scheduled time. On top of it, since November 2024, runs the real time adjustment, which raises the bar inside the interval between blocks.

How many confirmations are needed

Formally one is enough thanks to the Avalanche vote running since September 2022, and since November 2025 a transaction gains final status within seconds before the block. Exchanges are still free to demand more under their own rules.

What is the network fee on eCash

Fractions of a cent: block space is abundant and there is no competition for it. We do not publish an exact average because sources disagree on it, but the order of magnitude is exactly that.

Does eCash have merged mining

No. XEC mining is separate and does not run alongside another coin on the same hardware. The only way to combine is automatic switching of hashrate between networks on the pool side.

Can eCash be mined with a graphics card or a processor

Technically possible, practically pointless. It is the same SHA-256 as Bitcoin, and the gap between a graphics card and an ASIC is measured in thousands of times at any electricity tariff.

Can third party firmware be installed

Yes, the network places no restrictions: firmware does not distinguish coins, the network is set by the pool address. On supported Antminer S19 and S21 machines the build is installed through HashCore Toolkit with a developer fee of 2.8 percent.

How do I reduce power consumption

Undervolting through a third party firmware build: lower voltage and frequency per board plus the AsicBoost mode. On eCash this weighs more than usual, because there are no fees and only 58 percent of the subsidy reaches the miner.

What power supply is needed

The stock PSU of the model at 220 volts, from 3.1 to 20 kilowatts depending on the machine. Each machine needs a separate line with a 16 to 32 ampere breaker.

How do I store XEC

The main wallet is Cashtab, available on the web, as an extension and on Android, and Electrum ABC covers the desktop. Supported hardware devices are Trezor through Electrum ABC, Satochip, D CENT and Ballet, and Trezor can also sign stake proofs.

What happens if the price falls

Income falls in proportion while the 42 percent deduction stays, so the electricity break even point moves down faster than on Bitcoin. Part of the hashrate will leave the network, difficulty will drop and income per terahash will recover partly, but not fully.